EVE Search - OK, let's try and work this out.

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

OK, let's try and work this out.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Drunk Driver Gallente	Posted - 2008.08.28 19:34:00 - [1] Originally by: Malcanis Stuff.... Trying to force others to adapt to your play style is understandable, but bad. .
Drunk Driver Gallente	Posted - 2008.08.28 19:59:00 - [2] Originally by: Malcanis Originally by: Drunk Driver Originally by: Malcanis Stuff.... Trying to force others to adapt to your play style is understandable, but bad. . I agree. That's why I want to stop adapting to untouchable carebears. Untouchable carebears..... Is this another attempt at pirate revenge for the suggested security changes to Empire? It sure seems that way. Untouchable carebears..... Yep, you gave yourself away with that one. .
Drunk Driver Gallente	Posted - 2008.08.28 20:54:00 - [3] Originally by: Malcanis I'm not arguing their decision. All I'm asking is to be insulated from the effects of it with distance, just as they have insulated the high-sec carebears with CONCORD. My guess is you're throwing this forum hissy fit because you've got a pirate alt somewhere that's doing Empire pirating. The new Empire security changes will ruin that for you. You're angry, and trying to get some payback against the carebears because you think their whining brought about those changes. Of course you can say you're just trying to make the game better. However your timing seems to be, well, suspect. Answer this question. How hard did you push for these changes BEFORE the new Empire security suggestions were posted? Could you link us to some those posts? Prove me wrong. I don't mind. .
Drunk Driver Gallente	Posted - 2008.08.28 21:05:00 - [4] Originally by: Sodium Phosphate Why does it matter when he posted his suggestion? Could you please contribute to the discussion instead of posting with and alt and trying to discredit the OP? Offer some suggestions of your own. Ummmm... Does he need you to defend him and what makes you think he can't prove he posted prior the the suggested security changes? Do you know something we don't? .
Drunk Driver Gallente	Posted - 2008.08.28 21:11:00 - [5] Originally by: Malcanis How could I prove this? OK How about this: I don't have a pirate alt. whatever pirating I've done, I've done with this character. As for "hissy fit"... can you point to the hissiest part? Something hissier than the posts you've made? Seems like I've made a post asking for constructive engagement and you're locked into a "whatever is good for PvPers is bad for me" mindset. So throw down. Take me at my word if you can. Produce an idea that suits you. I will not take you at your word. Your word means nothing to me. I observe your actions and find them suspect. I've explained why. You've chosen not to respond. Which means, you're actions are still suspect. .
Drunk Driver Gallente	Posted - 2008.08.28 21:14:00 - [6] Originally by: Ki An Originally by: Sodium Phosphate Why does it matter when he posted his suggestion? Could you please contribute to the discussion instead of posting with and alt and trying to discredit the OP? Offer some suggestions of your own. Because Drunk Driver has long since lost the plot completely. When the discussion started going over his head, he started trolling. It's a common phenomenon... ... in stupid people. All he has to do is prove he was complaining about this with the same passion BEFORE the security changes were posted. That's not hard. Even you could do it. .
Drunk Driver Gallente	Posted - 2008.08.28 21:18:00 - [7] Originally by: Malcanis Originally by: Drunk Driver Originally by: Sodium Phosphate Why does it matter when he posted his suggestion? Could you please contribute to the discussion instead of posting with and alt and trying to discredit the OP? Offer some suggestions of your own. Ummmm... Does he need you to defend him and what makes you think he can't prove he posted prior the the suggested security changes? Do you know something we don't? . So what's your theory? I'm asking for a viable alternative literally as far from Empire as possible as part of a complicated plot to kill kittens in hi-sec? Come on man, you're not even trying. Yawn....... Non-answer. Still waiting for those links. .
Drunk Driver Gallente	Posted - 2008.08.29 00:56:00 - [8] I'm really starting to get the impression that someone is angry about the proposed Empire security changes. .
Drunk Driver Gallente	Posted - 2008.08.30 15:24:00 - [9] Originally by: Malcanis Tell that to the people who've spent the last year crying for PvP nerfs. And got their way. Meanwhile, I am adapting. I'm using their tactic. You do realize you just admitted to my claim that this is nothing more than a pirate revenge thread don't you? .
Drunk Driver Gallente	Posted - 2008.08.30 15:48:00 - [10] Originally by: Malcanis Originally by: Sarin Adler First, apologies, I'm not an habitual of this threads, they are boring and a waste of time usually. So you think they are affecting the economy in a way they shouldn't. Fair enough, but have you though that CCP does not care a single bit? Maybe this 'status quo' is better for them becuase this how the game has turned to be. Er, yes, I have thought that. That's the basis of the thread. If you read the stuff Malcanis has written in other threads then this thread would make more sense. It's some sort of forum warfare to screw with Empire to get back at the carebears that live there. He admitted to it a few posts above. Malcanis is mad over the suggested security changes. This is a revenge thread. .

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.